University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna - Research portal

Diagrammed Link to Homepage University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna

Morality in animals:what it means and why it matters

Few philosophical ideas have been as resistant to a paradigm shift as the assumption of human superiority over other animals. Human uniqueness has been linked to a range of complex social and cognitive capacities, e.g. the capacity to reason, to use language or culture, or to have consciousness. Most prominently, man understands himself as the pinnacle of creation because of his moral capacities: humans can cooperate with others, console them and help them, show empathy and care, understand fairness and react negatively to inequity. But what if other animals can do so as well?During the past few decades, empirical research in comparative cognition has revealed astonishing abilities in animals. Biologists and philosophers are currently engaged in a vivid debate on how to interpret these findings. Our project contributes to this endeavor by addressing two main questions: What does morality in animals mean? And why does morality in animals matter? Philosopher Mark Rowlands claims that animals are moral subjects because they can be motivated by moral emotions. However, much conceptual work still needs to be done in order to determine whether animals can indeed behave morally. Departing from Rowlands’ theory, we firstly aim to specify the character and cognitive requirements of moral emotions in animals. Whereas the current debate mostly concentrates on empathy as a moral emotion and on morally good behavior, we will engage in an analysis of other moral emotions, such as patience, compassion, guilt, and grief and, furthermore, consider negative moral emotions, such as cruelty, jealousy, schadenfreude, and callousness. Secondly, we will ask whether the attribution of morality to animals comes with ethical implications – a dimension that scholars in the debate have widely neglected. Our project aims to counter this shortcoming by analyzing the consequences of being a moral subject from the perspective of three important theories in animal ethics: the capabilities approach, the integrity approach, and the rights approach. This will elucidate the entitlements animals could have as moral subjects.We want our theoretical discussions to move beyond the proverbial armchair. Therefore, we will apply an interdisciplinary and empirically-informed methodology. Ultimately, our theoretical analysis will provide us with a conceptual toolkit to identify and discuss practical cases where humans might interfere with the moral abilities of animals. It is for example impossible for a social animal to console a conspecific in distress if husbandry conditions on farms and in labs separate individuals from each other. Also, some animal experiments aim at reducing the animals’ moral abilities (like their empathic abilities) by brain surgery or extreme forms of conditioning. Examples like these gain an additional ethical dimension if the animals affected by these practices are moral subjects.
Morality in animals
Project leader
Benz-Schwarzburg Judith
FWF Einzelprojekte
Type of Research
Basic research
Vetmed Research Units
Messerli Research Institute, Ethics and Human-Animal Studies
Funded by
FWF - Fonds zur Förderung der wissenschaftlichen Forschung, Sensengasse 1, 1090 Wien, Austria

Link To Project Finder
6 Publications

Monsó, S (2019): How to Tell If Animals Can Understand Death. Erkenntnis 2019;
Open Access Logo [Article in Press]

Monsó, S; Grimm, H (2019): An Alternative to the Orthodoxy in Animal Ethics? Limits and Merits of the Wittgensteinian Critique of Moral Individualism. Animals (Basel). 2019; 9(12):1057
Open Access Logo

Benz-Schwarzburg, J; Monsó, S; Wrage, B (2019): Morality in animals, the case of grief and the role of touch. Workshop Grimm-Wild 2019; MAY 6, 2019; Vetmeduni Vienna, Austria. 2019.

Benz-Schwarzburg, J; Andrews, K; Botero, M; Monsó, S; Wrage, B (2019): Can animals be moral? Assessing conceptual challenges and ethical implications. A9-A12.-EurSafe 2019; SEP 18–21, 2019; Tampere, Finland. (ISBN: 978-90-8686-341-9 )

Nawroth, C; Langbein, J; Coulon, M; Gabor, V; Oesterwind, S; Benz-Schwarzburg, J; von Borell, E (2019): Farm Animal Cognition-Linking Behavior, Welfare and Ethics. Front Vet Sci. 2019; 6:24
Open Access Logo

Monsó, S; Benz-Schwarzburg, J; Bremhorst, A (2018): Animal Morality: What It Means and Why It Matters. J Ethics. 2018; 22(3):283-310
Open Access Logo

© University of Veterinary Medicine ViennaHelp and Downloads