Veterinärmedizinische Universität Wien Forschungsinformationssystem VetDoc

Grafischer Link zur Startseite der Vetmeduni Vienna

Gewählte Publikation:

Open Access Logo

Publikationstyp: Zeitschriftenaufsatz
Dokumentart: Originalarbeit

Publikationsjahr: 2019

AutorInnen: Dale, R; Palma-Jacinto, S; Marshall-Pescini, S; Range, F

Titel: Wolves, but not dogs, are prosocial in a touch screen task.

Quelle: PLoS One. 2019; 14(5):e0215444



Autor/innen der Vetmeduni Vienna:

Dale Rachel
Marshall Sarah
Range Friederike

Beteiligte Vetmed-Organisationseinheiten
Konrad Lorenz Institut für Vergleichende Verhaltensforschung


Zugehörige(s) Projekt(e): Kooperation bei Caniden: Kognition und Emotionen


Abstract:
Prosociality is important for initiating cooperation. Interestingly, while wolves rely heavily on cooperation, dogs" do so substantially less thus leading to the prediction that wolves are more prosocial than dogs. However, domestication hypotheses suggest dogs have been selected for higher cooperation, leading to the opposing prediction- increased prosocial tendencies in dogs. To tease apart these hypotheses we adapted a paradigm previously used with pet dogs to directly compare dogs and wolves. In a prosocial choice task, wolves acted prosocially to in-group partners; providing significantly more food to a pack-member compared to a control where the partner had no access to the food. Dogs did not. Additionally, wolves did not show a prosocial response to non-pack members, in line with previous research that social relationships are important for prosociality. In sum, when kept in the same conditions, wolves are more prosocial than their domestic counterpart, further supporting suggestions that reliance on cooperation is a driving force for prosocial attitudes.


© Veterinärmedizinische Universität Wien Hilfe und Downloads